| Lowbagger.org
|
![]() |
The appeal
shows how the Forest
Service, in approving the ski area expansion, has violated the National
Environmental Policy Act, the Gallatin National Forest Plan, the
National
Forest Management Act, and the standards for government decision-making
under
the Administrative Procedure Act. Phil
Knight, a co-founder of NFN and
long-time Bridger Bowl skier, explained “We like to ski at Bridger Bowl
as much
as anybody else, but there are great things in the Bridgers worth
promoting and
protecting besides just downhill skiing. Here
the Forest Service is allowing Bridger Bowl to expand
north into
the Bradley Meadows area, where new development will chop up the
largest
old-growth forest in the Bridgers and will degrade important habitat
for
wolverine, moose, and pine marten in the South Fork of Brackett Creek. The Forest Service could have allowed Bridger
Bowl to expand to the south into the Slushman drainage, but leave the
important
wildlife habitat in the Bradley Meadows area undeveloped.
Instead, the Forest Service approved the
maximum possible Bridger Bowl expansion to both the north and the
south, and
that is where we draw the line.” Knight
continued, “The Forest has
failed to show why Bridger Bowl needs more ski terrain. The entire plan
is
based on input from undisclosed ‘skier focus groups’ who supposedly
demand that
Bridger Bowl expand to provide ‘uncrowded skiing.’ Yet the numbers are
not
there to show that current ski conditions are crowded, except on rare
days.
Even though no one can show why it is necessary, the Forest Service has
granted
Bridger Bowl the maximum expansion acreage.” Four local
backcountry skiers,
concerned about loss of traditional public access to skiing in the
Bradley
Meadows and South Fork Brackett Creek area, also joined the appeal. NFN also
accused the Forest Service of
failing to analyze the impacts of this expansion in conjunction with
other
human activities in the area, such as snowmobiling and four-wheeling.
In
evaluating the proposal, the Environmental Protection Agency stated, “It is likely that expansion of the Bridger Bowl
Ski
Area...may hasten and accelerate growth, development, and land use
change with
resulting indirect environmental effects on air and water and other
natural
systems, since visiting skiers require vehicles, roads, water supply,
wastewater treatment, restaurants, hotels, etc.”
The appeal
is now before the Regional
Forester Kathleen A. McAllister. |
Lowbagger
Home Features Grizzly Futures: The Bear vs. the Bush Administration By Louisa Willcox Season of the Buffalo By Dan Brister A Healthy-Sized Harvest By Matt Koehler Wilderness Study Area Assault By Larry Campbell Departments Publisher's Notebook Satan is My Co-Pilot By Mike Roselle Editor's Corner What is Lowbagger.org? What is a lowbagger? By Josh Mahan On the Ground Plutonium Wind Threatens Tetons By Mary Woolen-Mitchell Green Politics Conservation and the Political Imperative By Howie Wolke National Affairs No Friend of Mine By Marilyn Olsen Planet Watch Major Free-Flowing River Faces Dams By Bryce Smedley School Zone Short, Aggressive Manifesto on Education By Shane Sanchez Readings Morning Light Shorts and Ecology By Tim Sandlin Floogle Watch The $11 Martini By Uncle Ramon Poet's Lounge His Likable Ways, and Shock and Awe By Greg Keeler Mean Streets By Phil Knight Love is a Glove By Derek Cook Mountain Step How to Lowbag a Peak By John Fothergill Conversations At the Barbershop By Peter Crumbaker Fiction Focus Coyote Goes Snowboarding By Phil Knight |