|
By Josh Mahan Mountaintop
removal coal
mining was dealt a serious blow on Friday, March 23 when a The court
ruled that the
Army Corps has been violating the CWA and NEPA for five years by
permitting
coal removal projects that blasted tops off of mountains placing the
debris in
nearby valleys. This debris is known as fill. These fill projects often
bury entire
headwaters of waterways. The court
now says that the
Corp’s fill policy must be revised. Regulators
in four
Appalachian states: "We
applaud the ruling
in federal court stating that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers violated
the law
by issuing mountaintop removal mining permits that allowed vital
headwater
streams to be permanently buried,” said Earthjustice attorney Steve
Roady. "The
federal government
has been illegally issuing such permits. Doing so has led to widespread
and
irreversible devastation to the streams, mountains and lands across Mountaintop
removal and valley-fill
ramped up in 2002 when the wording of the Clean Water Act was tweaked.
With
this new wording the coal industry got busy blasting the tops off
coal-bearing
mountains and dumping the dirt into nearby valleys making a sterile
plateau out
of the Extractive
industries like
Massey Coal and their associated governmental regulatory agencies like
the Army
Corps have once again proven that they know how to tie up environmental
issues
in court. Here they have scalped the nation’s oldest mountain range and
dumped
the debris into drinking supplies for five years illegally, stringing
the issue
along in court while irreversibly destroying mountain after mountain;
stream
after stream. Massey and
the Corps have made
a complete ruin of What a
slap on the wrist!
These guys should be put on a prison crew restoring the In court
talk it sounds like
this. You can see the ruling here. “The court
finds that the
Corps failed to comply with the CWA and NEPA when it issued the
permits. The
CWA permit cannot be issued unless the Corps complies with the
404(b)(1)
guidelines and with NEPA. The Corps did not adequately address certain
issues
as to the impacts of the mining activity on the environment. [We are]
remanding
the permits to the Corps for reconsideration in light of this
memorandum.” Is this
first grade? A
permit cannot be issued unless it’s lawful. They need the court to tell
them
that. These people are supposed to be the best and brightest. There is a
page on the Army
Corps website entitled Qs and As On
The “Fill” Rule. The first
Q is: Are the
Corps and EPA proceeding with a rule change that would allow new
dumping of
mining wastes in the Nation’s waters? The A: The
rule does not
change current practice with regard to the regulation of materials
placed in
the Nation’s waters, including those generated by mining – if it wasn’t
allowed
before, it won’t be allowed now. No discharge could take place without
a permit
that meets Clean Water Act Standards. The rule itself does not
authorize any
discharges. The coal
companies will one
day be crippled and bankrupt when they have to pay for the wrong
they’ve
caused. But that won’t be enough. No amount of money can change what
has been
destroyed in its pursuit. |
|