Lowbagger.org
                                                                      "Environmental News and Arts"                                                     Sept. 13, 2005


Summer Letters and Readings

Latest Roadless Scam
http://lowbagger.org/bipartisanbill.html

Wait just a minute. This same group of professional Democratic Party sycophants ALREADY claimed that Clinton "protected 60 million acres" --- these same acres.

How many bites at the apple do these twits get? When will Mike "General McClellan" Francis just retire and take the rest of his loser cabal with him?

If you think this latest fund-raising Bill is going anywhere, I've got a slightly used Bridge to the 21st Century for sale.

This is unworthy of Lowbagger.org.

Michael Donnelly
Salem, Oregon


Check Liver, Install Governor

Although it seems the poll has closed, I will send my response anyway.
I believe the question “do I drink too much?” is one of the greatest
philosophical questions of this luxurious, decadent society, perhaps second
to why does one bother to live this life and not saw one¹s own head off?
Part of the reason for the great reflection on the question is the scare
tactics instilled in us by the Firm and other powers. I am sure you
learned, as I did, that one is probably an alcoholic if one contemplates
whether one is an alcoholic. What sort of logic is that?

The reality is that many of us view New Year¹s Eve as “amateur night” and
rely on alcohol as a coping mechanism. But the more important reality is
that without alcohol I would probably not have learned the lyrics to the
”Jack Daniels” song at Roselle¹s 50th birthday party. Without alcohol, the
elders would certainly be less likely to share their oral history and wisdom
with the youth. And that would be tragic.

I do agree that going to the clinic is an opportunity one would not want to
pass on, regardless of drinking style. And I agree it is quite appropriate
for Mike to get his liver checked out and that like myself, Mike lacks a
governor between his brain and mouth at times. But when it comes to shelving
the medicine, I don¹t believe that is appropriate. Daddy needs his
medication. Do it for the children, for the kids.

You gotta unload to reload.

Derek Volkart
Ashland
, Oregon


Dry Times

Very little would be lost, old boy, from some structured drying out. Give
Betty a shot- at the least you will leave with some rich, bloggy goodness to
write about.

Michael Faherty

Packer Bob Always A Friend
Dear Editor,                              

Thank you for the ode to my brother: "The Legend of Packer Bob."  You covered the Memorial well.  The photo of our brother, Norm was very good!  Would you be willing to Email me the photo of Norm?  That's so good of him, I'd like to keep a copy of it for our family files. 

I wasn't surprised that Bob had so many friends, because he's always been friendly and outgoing. I have many fond memories of my brothers and our lives in Payette, Idaho.  It was touching that so many people showed up to remember Bob. The military salute was wonderful too. Bringing Bob's ashes into the park on a pack horse, with his hat over top, made a great picture, and was very appropriate.  Who wrote the Selway poem on back of the "funeral card?"  Was it one of your staff?  It's wonderful to have your article and the Missoulian article to preserve in our family files.  Thank you.

Sincerely,        
Bob's sister Gerrie


Bush’s Reign Tough On the Environment, Green President Needed

"Calamity George", a.k.a. George W. Bush, and his sidekick "Creepy Cheney" have undoubted headed the worst federal administration in the history of the American republic, with no more egregious impact than in their environmental record.  Ronald Reagan and James Watt almost seem ineffective, if not downright moderate compared to this calamitous crew.

Not only have asthmatic schoolchildren in the Eastern Seaboard suffered from deliberate weakening of clean air laws, but children from Twin Falls, Idaho to Causey, New Mexico to Bartlesville, Oklahoma have seen opportunities to see prairie grouse and sage grouse reduced by politically driven decisions to avoid protecting these formerly superabundant birds and many other flora and fauna under the Endangered Species Act.

The reign of Calamity George has been calamitous to the habitat of everything from humans to polar bears to spotted owls and the only real beneficiaries of the
Bush anti-environmental movement have been the industry lobbyists who have been hired to run agencies like foxes guarding the henhouse. The foxes have not
only guarded the henhouse, but have been actively tearing down the henhouse structure to make their friends' work of predation all the easier.

The only good news is that, unless the U.S. Constitution is altered, the Bush Administration will be over in a few years.  Will yin turn into yang? Will despair turn into hope?  Will anti-environmentalism be replaced with a new era of
desperately needed conservationism, protectionism, and restorationism (the environmental CPR recommended by the late, great David Brower)?

Make no mistake about it!  Leaving Bush behind, we will absolutely need to not only restore our environmental ethic, but we will need to undo the damage, strengthen the laws and regulations, purge the agencies, consolidate the initiative, and put into the White House a strongly committed conservationist as President.  We will need a president who will put people with strong ecological conscience in positions of power in the new administration.  We will need an
Andy Kerr in charge of the Forest Service, a George Wuerthner in charge of the BLM, a Mike Roselle as Secretary of the Interior, a Reed Noss in charge of
the Fish and Wildlife Service.

We will need to pass legislation to strengthen the Endangered Species Act, while making it fair as possible to those impacted by it.  We will need to make cleaning the environment profitable as a business practice.  We will need to make sure that businesses can no longer externalize the cost of their operations onto the consumer by avoiding the environmental costs of their operations into public funding.

We will need to fully fund conservation science and drastically improve monitoring of species, ecosystems, and impacts. 

All of this is very doable.  We need to defund the war-making machinery that puts billions of dollars into the pockets and accounts of the corporate elite and increase funding for labor-intensive cleanup, restoration, and monitoring.  A few billion dollars may buy only one aircraft carrier, but will go a very long way if diverted from naval warfare to oceanic restoration, including fisheries recovery.  A squadron of stealth fighter/bombers costs tens of millions, if
not hundreds of millions of dollars, but why do we need such weapons to fight "terrorists" without air forces whatsoever?  We can use that money to clean the air, protect birds and reduce greenhouse emissions.

After a period of calamity for the nation's environment, what a pleasure it should be to completely reverse course and start a real, prolonged period of healing and protection for our nation's environment, wildlife, human habitat, and survival
resources for all the above.  We can dwell on natural beauty, not unnatural degradation, peace and not war, ecology and not just the economy, and we can show that Calamity George was a mutant, an aberrant, and a failure. 

Let's be thinking of how we can accomplish this healing.  Let's get some tactics in mind, some strategies worked out, some people motivated and
organized. The world is such a big, complex place, that not even Calamity George could completely destroy it.  But a lot of damage has been done, and we need to prepare for a sorely needed recovery.

Stan Moore   

San Geronimo, CA

Traveler Misses Rocky Mountain Summer Lowbag Lifestyle
Poor Lowbagger  has been side-stepped for nice summer days, cold beer at the Iron horse, nice money tips' from clueless farang rafters, hot nights at charlies served with fresh cripsy chicken wings, clean rivers with cold water, Ole’s coffee in the wee hours of the morning, long dusty mountain trails, bright stars that criss-cross the sky while you lay in open meadows with the fresh aroma of elk poo drops, long hour drives to Yellowstone to visit and laugh with Mom and Howie, long hours spent in our public lands wondering about a vehicle that broke down with Lewis & Clark painted on the side of it, relaxing evening dinners in peoples' back yards watching the Dogs run around chasing and sniffing each-other, listening and trying to understand how Darwinism has failed by allowing Jimmy to live and use natural resources with out giving anything back to the planet.  Yes, I know the excitements of the Western lifestyles that occupy your time. This is something that haunts me in
Bangkok. I am feeling a little out of my bio-sphere at this moment. 

Toast one for me, and publish my article.

Bryce Smedley
Bangkok, Thailand

Monkey Wrench Gang the Movie Purportedly In the Works

Hey SFB,
I spotted an update from May that filmmaker Catherine Hardwicke (Lords of
Dogtown) and Sony Pictures are moving on the making of the Monkey Wrench
Gang
, which means that Dennis Hopper will not be directing the movie.
Apparently Hardwicke wants him to play a role in it.

I am uncertain that having Hopper direct it would have been a good thing
after hearing that he was going to speak in favor of George W. Bush at his
second inauguration (he was later disinvited). Would he have given us a
negative portrayal of our most famous literary environmental saboteurs, or
would Hopper's allegiance to Bush, if it still exists after being snubbed,
have been set aside for the making of the movie. And is Woody going to play
a role in it? Can you give us an update on the status of this film or just
make something up to make me feel better?

They need to hurry up with the movie. The FBI field agents are restless and
tired of harassing legitimate environmental non-profits. Plus, the state
needs to spend some more counter-terrorism dollars.

Morning Dew
Oregon

Fool Me Once
Ed’s Note: The following is a letter from Bozeman’s Steve Kelly to a weekly paper in Missoula about their treatment of a news story that explores common-ground, consensual forest thinning in western Montana’s rural-urban interface. Kelly “wanted to share,” and asked readers to “comment, criticize, or delete”.

Isn't it great that we're building trust with the Forest Service? Reminds me of those kind souls trying to rehabilitate violent sexual predators.

For 100 years, the Forest Service priority has been the same: subsidized commodity production, not conservation.  What is the cost to taxpayers?  Why are all participants EVST graduates?  Which foundations fund this Hollywood Dream, and why?  Aren't conventional conservation efforts marginalized for being too extreme, compared to these flashy new academic gymnastics?  Is Ovando "urban?"

Can Democrats breathe easier?  Now that's fundable!

Because of selective collaboration, does the public no longer need to be informed/involved -- until the decision has already been made?  Now that we know about the process ("Process-Process"), how about an article explaining the ecological, economic and legal implications?  For balance, how about a not-so-sure-about-this voice in the news, if it is news at all.  Jobs, jobs, jobs, is what I see, not much else to brag about here.

Steve Kelly
Bozeman, MT 

Check Out the Future Patriots

Hey Josh and Mikey,
I was wondering if you could make a plug on Lowbagger for my buddy's mock
band "The Future Patriots."  Check out their website at
www.futurepatriots.com and give a listen to "Jesus Built my M-16."
How could you not like a band whose members' names are General Malaise,
Private Issues, and Major Paine?
Let me know . . . many thanks.
Jeff Goin

San Diego, CA

Wanted: One Dam-Fighter
Hey, Rosellovich.

Here, things are just fine, although it gets tiring being a damfighter-for-hire. Tomorrow, I´m going down South for a meeting on Uruguay River dams, then to the Amazon for a meeting on the aluminum industry and its energy gluttony, then to Mato Grosso for a meeting on plans to cover the continent with roads, industrial waterways, dams and soybeans.

 I figure I´m nearing retirement age, but since I can´t afford to retire, and have a little kid, Gabriel, I’ll probably be wrestling with recalcitrant NGOs well into my 70’s. Just today, Selma was trying to figure out why her apple tort didn’t come out like yours.

Hope to see you down this way sometime. Take care of your foot, and stick to the waltz!

Best,

Glenn Switkes
International Rivers Network
São Paulo, www.irn.org

List-Serve Warfare in the Environmental Movement
If there were any illusions out there that the environmental movement in America was cohesive please read on. Death and hateful disorganization are two different issues.  

Eat this, Watson.

Patrick Moore

Environmentalists' sick sensationalism
By Patrick Moore
Published By The
San Francisco Examiner: Wednesday, July 20

Since the late 1980s, the environmental movement has lost its way, abandoning science and logic in favor of emotion and sensationalism. I left Greenpeace after 15 years as a founding member. Today, we're faced with environmental policies that ignore science and result in increased risk to human health and ecology. To borrow from the vernacular, how sick is that?
Genetic enhancement: Activists persist in their zero-tolerance campaign against genetically enhanced food, yet there is no evidence of harm to human health or the environment. Genetically enhanced crops reduce chemical pesticides, boost yield and reduce soil erosion. Enriched with Vitamin A, golden rice could prevent blindness in 500,000 children every year in
Asia and Africa if activists would stop blocking its introduction.

Salmon farming: The campaign against salmon farming, based on erroneous claims of environmental damage, scares us into avoiding one of the most nutritious, heart-friendly foods available. Salmon farming takes pressure off wild stocks, yet activists tell us to eat only wild fish. Is this how we save them, by eating more?

Vinyl: Greenpeace wants to ban the use of chlorine in all industrial processes. The addition of chlorine to drinking water has been the greatest public health advance in history, and 75 percent of our medicines are based on chlorine chemistry. Greenpeace calls for a ban on polyvinyl chloride (PVC or vinyl), claiming it is the "poison plastic." There is not a shred of evidence that vinyl damages human health or the environment. Apart from lowering construction costs and delivering safe drinking water, vinyl's ease of maintenance and its ability to incorporate anti-microbial properties is critical to fighting germs in hospitals.
Hydroelectricity: Hydroelectricity is the largest source of renewable electricity, yet activists boast they have blocked more than 200 hydroelectric dams in the developing world. Do activists prefer coal plants? Would they rather ignore the needs of billions of people?

Wind power: Activists argue wind turbines kill birds and ruin landscapes. A million times more birds are killed by cats, windows and cars than by all the windmills in the world. Wind turbines are works of art compared to some of our urban environments.
Nuclear power: Activists continue to lobby against nuclear energy, the only power source that does not emit greenhouse gases and can replace fossil fuels and satisfy global demand. Renewable energies such as wind, geothermal and hydroelectric are only part of the solution.
Forestry: Trees are the most abundant, renewable and biodegradable resource in the world, yet activists tell us to reduce our use of wood. Forests are stable and growing where we use the most wood, and diminishing where we use less. Using wood sends a signal to the marketplace to plant more trees and produce more wood. There is about the same forest area in
North America as there was 100 years ago.

The prognosis: Activists' zero-tolerance, fear-mongering campaigns could ultimately prevent a cure for Vitamin A deficiency blindness, deplete wild salmon stocks, decrease the safety of health care, deprive developing nations of clean electricity, stop renewable wind energy, block a solution to global warming and contribute to deforestation. How sick is that?

Co-founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, Ph.D is chairman and chief scientist of Greenspirit Strategies Ltd. in
Vancouver, Canada.

What do you want me to eat Pat? Your opinion piece in the S.F. Examiner is crap and thus uneatable
Dear Pat,

Well beat me with a feather until I bleed. This is an opinion piece by you. So it's in the S.F. Examiner. As Shania Twain said, "that don't impress me much. I've had opinion pieces in Newsweek, The Vancouver Sun, The Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post. Big frigging deal. Just what is it you want me to eat?

In this puff piece for corporate America you say that environmentalists do not consult with scientists. Baloney Pat, absolute baloney. I can assure you that the Sierra Club, NRDC, Greenpeace and Sea Shepherd all back up our policies with science. Are you saying that E.O, Wilson, Paul Erhlich, David Lavigne, Roger Payne, David Suzuki, just to name a few examples are not credible scientists?

What really amazes me is that whereas we are working on issues that actually protect the health and welfare of human beings, you make the accusation that our polices risk human health. In stead you advise us to eat hormone, chemically adulterated farm raised salmon, and to eat strawberries with halibut genes spliced into their DNA. You want us to support increases logging and increased fishing in already over-fished eco-systems. You want us to live better chemically and you endorse nuclear reactors and the waste that goes with it. You want to promote genetically enhanced crops in order to encourage further population growth to put even more stress on our already over-stressed environments. And you want us to love chlorine and don't give me this crap about vinyl not having affected anyone's health. There is plenty of evidence to the contrary and this evidence has been well documented.

You say fish farming takes pressure off of wild fish populations yet the fact is that it takes from 30 to 50 fish caught from the wild to feed and raise one of your slave fish.


And no, environmentalists do not prefer coal plants. What we prefer is a lowering of human populations to levels that do not steal carrying capacity from other species.


Your absolutely ridiculous statement that there is the same percentage of forested area in America as there was 100 years ago is just plain fraudulent. Are you saying that all the freeways, developments, malls, factories and other human fabrications are on land that was treeless a century ago? Read Thoreau's A Walk in a Maine Woods to see what we have lost. The great redwood forests are gone you idiot. The great old growth forests of this entire continent are no more you lying piece of scum.


You have the audacity to call environmentalists sick for working to protect eco-systems and human health. You can spin it anyway you wish but the bottom line is that you are a sell-out, a whore, and a first class tree killing, Ox-raping son of a bitch.


Paul Watson 


MacGyver To
Figure Way To Save Movement

Paul, Let’s plan a get together in LA with Richard Dean Anderson. We can talk about our strategies to fight the empire and protect nature. I suspect he knows the gutsier Hollywood crowd. It would be fun to come down and see you. We can talk about an intensive 25 year campaign to promote “EARTH ECONOMICS” i.e. ecologize capitalism or find some post-capital markets system that doesn’t make people’s eyes roll.

I’ll contact him if you want, but don’t have any contact info. Do you?

Randy Hayes, Executive Director
International Forum on Globalization
San Francisco, CA www.ifg.org

P.S. I’m glad you are on pathological Patrick’s ass, I try to avoid the schmuck.

P.S.S. Roselle is still no-good!


Lowbagger Home