Lowbagger.org     

        "A voice in the cyberspace wilderness."                                                   February 2005      

Grizzly Futures:
The Bear vs. the Bush Administration

By Louisa Willcox

The growing drumbeat to remove endangered species protections for Yellowstone grizzlies later this year raises the question: Where are we and where are we going with the future of the grizzly?  

In his most recent book Monsters of God, author David Quammen answers it this way, “Call me a pessimist, but when I look into the future, I don’t see any lions, tigers, or bears…my guess, a regretfully gloomy one, is that the last wild, viable, free ranging populations of big flesh eaters will disappear somewhere around the middle of the next century.  I see the year 2150 as the probably end point of the special relationship between us and them.  That’s not far off, less than eight human generations.  It is just enough time to encompass a welter of uncertainties… along with one weighty inevitability; the continuing growth of human population and consumption.”

I know that I am not alone in wanting desperately to prove Dave Quammen wrong.  We need not and should not accept such a fate for the great carnivores such as the grizzly, an animal that is a barometer of the health of the Northern Rockies ecosystems and a wilderness icon, lying at the heart of the western experience in the U.S. and Canada and the meaning of national parks such as Yellowstone, Glacier, Banff and Jasper.

But this unthinkable fate had crept a few steps closer with the reelection of George W. Bush, whose administration has wasted no time announcing their next wave of assaults on the environment, all with bad consequences for bears -- energy development in the West, proposals to weaken the Endangered Species Act, and the Orwellian “Healthy Forests” initiative.”  Reduced by 99% of its former numbers in the lower 48 states in just over 200 years, the grizzly, with only 1500 or so animals remaining, has perhaps never been so threatened.

One of the worst proposals is the removal of endangered species protections for Yellowstone grizzlies, anticipated later this year. Delisting is premature because habitat protections are inadequate, current numbers are too small to ensure long-term health, and development and human population are escalating in and around grizzly habitat. Further, delisting will remove the “look before you leap” provisions of the Endangered Species Act, facilitating development of important habitat. And management of bears would be turned over to the states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, which are heavily influenced by the energy and other industries. Making matters worse, all three states would allow a grizzly hunt, which would exacerbate current problems of excessive grizzly mortality. For example, roughly 19 grizzlies were killed last year, including 9 females. Although the killing rates for females are higher than the population can sustain and violate the allowable limits established by the agencies, the cry for delisting has not diminished in recent months.

In addition, there are communities waiting in the wings to kill bears as soon as delisting occurs. Four counties in Wyoming where many bears currently live have passed resolutions that state that grizzlies are unacceptable, and commissioners have made it clear that they intend to kill bears that roam in the county. After delisting, the counties will have a greater say in grizzly management. 

Of particular concern is the fact that delisting plans do not protect one third of the currently occupied habitat in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. These lands, located mostly in Wyoming, are under increasing pressure for oil and gas and other development.  

Finally, if numbers plummet after delisting, there is little chance of relisting the grizzly, partly because the trigger mechanisms in the delisting plans are discretionary and vague. And, the Bush administration has successfully avoided listing voluntarily a single species, despite a backlog of thousands of species which are in danger of extinction. Litigation to relist will be time consuming, possibly proving to be too little, too late. 

The proposed delisting of Yellowstone bears promises to be a major battle over the next few years. Natural Resources Defense Council and other organizations has made a major commitment to preventing premature delisting until grizzly numbers have increased, habitat is adequately protected and populations are restored in the Selway Bitteroot Ecosystem and reconnected from Yellowstone to Canada

The good news in this otherwise bleak picture is that it is still possible to get it right for bears in Yellowstone and elsewhere, and for all those who love them, now and generations to come.  Thanks in part to new scientific information developed by experts David Mattson, Troy Merrill, Lance Craighead and many others, we do know that we can indeed achieve a fully recovered population in the lower-48 states of 2,000 to 3,000 animals.  We need not and should not settle for isolated populations of several hundred individuals which will always be vulnerable to extinction.  We can achieve this lasting recovery by taking some simple daring steps. We must:

       1.)    Expand the size of the areas where bears can roam.

2.)    Restore bears to the now vacant Selway/Bitterroot Ecosystem which can harbor 400 or more bears.

3.)    Connect grizzly ecosystems to each other in the lower-48 states and to Canadian sources populations, rather than continuing to manage bears as isolated populations. 

4.)    Harvest the lessons learned over the last several decades about how to make peace with the Great Bear.

5.)    Engage—each and every one of us—in a transparent, fair and democratic process, the likes of which does not yet exist in the bear world in the U.S. or Canada, but that we must help create.


Why does the grizzly need all this?  First are the serious biological strikes against the bear, which make it easy to exterminate and hard to grow. Slow reproductive rates, lower than any other mammal in North America. Large home range, 450 square miles or more. Appetites that match ours and lead to conflicts with beehives and sheep pens and gardens. Long lives, and memories, that can lead a bear from its first  taste of an apple to death as a result of conditioning to human food. 

Second is the irrefutable fact that the future of bear habitat in the West will not look like the past of the present.  It will look far worse as a result of human population growth, escalating development, mounting off-road vehicles, and snowmobiles which are buzzing thought bear habitat in early summer—in some places four months after bears have emerged from their dens.  Global warming will dramatically change the bear’s food sources, reducing the amount of key foods in some areas, such as Yellowstone. This trend will prompt grizzlies to forage more widely in areas where they will be more vulnerable to lethal conflicts with humans. And, compounding these problems are the effects of disease and introduced species on key native foods, such as white bark pine and Yellowstone cutthroat trout.   

Third, the current systems are failing the bear and will worsen under this administration.  The reason is that the government is: 1.) operating their programs on too small as scale, managing isolated individual populations, rather than a connected whole; 2.) cutting funds needed for protection such as law enforcement; 3.)  applying unprecedented levels of direct political pressure on agencies to exploit resources; 4.) effectively banking on Canada to provide bears to fuel U.S. grizzly recovery, even though Alberta bears are not in good shape and are declining in number; 5.) allowing the Selkirks, Cabinet Yaak and North Cascades populations to go extinct, in part by putting the lion’s share of available grizzly resources into delisting Yellowstone and Glacier bears.

 

 

So, how do we to a better future for bears? In my recent publication “Bear With Us: An Alternative Path to Grizzly Recovery in Yellowstone”, I suggest the following.

1. Protect Secure Habitat.

Given the current isolation and fragmentation of grizzly habitat, it is essential to protect all remaining wildlands. This step would go a long way to expanding bear populations and connecting remaining ecosystems. <> 

2. Restore Degraded Habitat.

Restoration could improve the condition of hundreds of thousands of acres that have been  so heavily roaded, mostly for timber, that today they constitute killing fields, rather than safe havens for bear.  Targeted road closures and obliteration would go a long way to expanding the areas were bears can be and connecting ecosystems. And the elimination of domestic sheep grazing on public lands would reduce lethal conflicts between grizzlies and sheep herders.  

3. Reduce Human Caused Mortality.

Much more needs to be done to reduce bear mortality by improving how people behave in bear country, in terms of handling garbage and other attractants, managing livestock, and pursuing big game and black bear hunting. Significant recent successes with managing bear attractants also points to the need to promote community approaches to resolving conflicts.

4. Promote Stewardship and Protection of Private Land 

About one fifth of possible suitable grizzly bear habitat for bear expansion is on private lands.  Many groups are committed to private lands conservation work, but land prices are increasing, and in some areas, the pace of development is outstripping the pace of land protection.

5. Develop a New Framework for Transboundary Grizzly Management 

Today, bear ecosystems are not managed as connected landscapes across the U.S./Canada border.  And in some cases, policies and programs are working at cross purposes. A focused and meaningful transboundary grizzly recovery effort must be initiated, including citizens, non-governmental organizations, scientists and agencies, emphasizing protection and restoration of degraded lands, and resolution of human-bear conflicts.

6. Improve Recovery Program with Broader Public Participation 

Reforming the grizzly recovery process is fundamental to improving the prospects for bears.  First the process must be opened up to scrutiny of its underlying assumptions. Specific measures for success and failure, as called for by the Society for Conservation Biology, Society of Mammalogy and others, must also be developed.  And, non-governmental organizations need to be included in the process, as recommended by the Academy of Sciences in 1974. 

How can all this happen? By rolling up our sleeves and connecting with our neighbors, elected officials and others to demand protection for grizzly bears and their wildland ecosystems.  By staying true to the place in our hearts that loves wild places and creatures and knows now is not the time to compromise. And by dreaming. Yes, dreaming. Because dreaming is the first step in recreating the world.

Native Americans have an old story of the bear dreamer, the bear that crawls into the den each winter to spend the darkest, coldest months dreaming the world into being.  Creating a whole ecosystem in one long winter’s dream.  With bears now so severely under siege, it is time for us all to become bear dreamers.  Dreaming and working to create a bigger, wilder landscape and communities to match.  We can do it, together.

 

Louisa Willcox is the Wild Bears Project Director of the Natural Resources Defense Council in Livingston, Mt. For more information on the campaign to protect grizzlies and prevent premature delisting in Yellowstone, please see www.nrdc.org. The publication “Bear With Us: An Alternative Path to Recovery of the Grizzly in the Lower 48 States” can be obtained by contacting Lwillcox@nrdc.org
Lowbagger Home

Features

Grizzly Futures: The Bear vs. the Bush Administration
By Louisa Willcox

Season of the Buffalo
By Dan Brister


A Healthy-Sized Harvest
By Matt Koehler

Wilderness Study Area Assault
By Larry Campbell

Departments

Publisher's Notebook
Satan is My Co-Pilot
By Mike Roselle

Editor's Corner
What is Lowbagger.org? What is a lowbagger?

By Josh Mahan


On the Ground
Plutonium Wind Threatens Tetons
By Mary Woolen-Mitchell

Green Politics
Conservation and the Political Imperative
By Howie Wolke


National Affairs
No Friend of Mine
By Marilyn Olsen

Planet Watch
Major Free-Flowing River Faces Dams
By Bryce Smedley

School Zone
Short, Aggressive Manifesto on Education
By Shane Sanchez


Readings
Morning Light
Shorts and Ecology
By Tim Sandlin

Floogle Watch
The $11 Martini
By Uncle Ramon

Poet's Lounge
His Likable Ways, and Shock and Awe
By Greg Keeler

Mean Streets
By Phil Knight

Love is a Glove
By Derek Cook

Mountain Step
How to Lowbag a Peak
By John Fothergill

Conversations
At the Barbershop
By Peter Crumbaker

Fiction Focus
Coyote Goes Snowboarding
By Phil Knight